|
|
Archive for the ‘Un Just’ Category
Yesterday, something horrible happened in a high school. 3 boys were accused of drugging and raping 3 girls in a park, a public restroom until stopped by on lookers. Because of a few very very bad eggs 1000’s of other boys get the same punishments for never even having committed a crime. News like that causes hysteria and panic, the lawmakers trying to boost popularity make harsher laws to treat the good, bad and every one in between in the same manner as the worst offender. You see, you can’t get a whole bunch of tax money over a few bad eggs, but you can get it in truck loads if you scare the public into believing it’s an epidemic. Read this letter and think twice before judging or voting on more money towards tracking these perverts of society. (BTW, less than 15% of the registry is even considered serious or violent but all get the same treatment from the serial rapist/murderer(.0001%) to the high school sweetheart). If you don’t believe me, it’s public and you can count how many for yourself. I was born 22 years ago to a middle class family. We lived in the suburbs, my dad a carpenter and my mom waited tables part time. We had money for most things, not rich, but able to afford yearly vacations and such. Growing up, I was never the cool or popular kid. I was shy I guess. I got bullied a bit in school as most kids do at some point or another. In Jr. High, the girls never liked me, I was a bit geeky I guess. I loved math and science and that wasn’t the coolest thing to be into. In high school, my luck with girls didn’t improve much until my senior year when I met a girl who thought I was great. I thought she was incredible, funny, brilliant and HOT. We dated all through my last year of school, I was a senior and she was a freshman. That did not matter, we had a great time together. I graduated and she went into the next grade. It was summer. I applied at a few colleges to study law and she was so proud of me. The school I chose was only a few hours away so we could see each other on weekends. We had never had sex, but discussed it, she wasn’t ready and I was not gonna push her. One summer night we ended up at the beach, we dismissed the “close at dusk” signs and went anyway. We were caught making out and charged with trespassing. It was kinda awkward but funny. Her parents picked her up from the station and I was just allowed to leave with a ticket being an adult now. About a month later, my parents (who I live with) got a call asking me to come into the station for an interview, I did. The police asked me what we were doing on the beach. I told them it was a date, we thought it was romantic. They asked me if I knew her age. I said of course, we had been dating for a year now. We met in high school , 2 semesters back. They asked if we had sex. I replied “is that your business? but no, we haven’t yet. They wanted to know what we had done and I told them we kissed and played around a bit, but that is all. To make a long story short, I got charged with child molestation and spent the next 6 months in jail. I am now a registered sex offender and my college education is but a dream. I am not allowed to live at home with my family because I have a younger brother who is 13. I am classified a violent predator, a child molester and my photo is on the sex offender website. My parents have now become separated over this and how much money has been spent on making sure I am not homeless since I can not get a job nor live at home. My college scholarships were revoked over this and my parents took out a loan for my college tuition that they still have to pay interest on. My little brother keeps running away and if I even go near him to talk to him, I can go to prison for 3 to 7 years. My now ex girlfriend is over 18 and has become addicted to meth. I have not seen her in years but I hear this from others. My life is over, I can never have a family since I can never be around kids and what woman would want me now anyways, jobless, homeless and a status of violent child predator? Another law in my state is getting passed that says registered offenders can not live within a few miles of a school or park. There is one of each in every community so I have no idea where to go. Like most in my situation I will go where they would like us to be, in prison. The difference between you and this sorry fool, he got caught doing what every teen does. The laws in many states say that a 3 year age difference, even when both are juveniles is a “sexual predatory” offense and molestation with life long consequences. So why do most schools open the door by being 4 to 5 year schools? Do they expect high schoolers to alienate themselves from junior classes? WTF? sick ass unjust shit. I wish that boy luck, but I know he will never get any luck nor justice. The witch hunt for the high (state dollars) paying predator incarcerations continues. Especially now since marijuana is becoming legal in many states and the 2 to 5 year jail sentences for possession are but a memory of money lost to corrections unions… the money has to come from somewhere … and there are tons of teens. The few horrific crimes in recent years also put them into the “public safety above all” clause allowing a persons rights to fly out a speeding cop cars window. Basic human rights, living in a home, privacy(address not published unless crime involved violence), having family, kids and FREEDOM. Do you smell that, I do, Our Beloved Constitution Burning.
Can we have a friendly competition at everyone else’s expense? sure you can if you are an LA Sheriff. What do you get if you win? Who knows but they say its bragging rights only. So our rights get sacrifised to ego boost and bragging rights at the cop bar (BTW, the only bar in town no one EVER gets a DUI out of)?
Before some fool reads this and says… but they are only targeting criminals, I can say, totally not true. When bored, they can screw with anyone. I may have felt the same way except an odd thing happened to me last year. Where I live is paroled by the LA Sheriffs, this is a low crime area and they are normally seen on the side of the canyon road running license plates at random. My 7 year old son and I went to the store, Upon leaving the store, I put the kid in the backseat, put on the seatbelt and walked around to the drivers side. At that time, the Sheriffs pulled in the lot and saw that my tags were expired. They stopped. before they even told me about the tags, I told them “I know the tags expired and the paperwork for the new tags is in the passenger visor”. I was behind my trunk and started walking back to the passenger side to get the DMV papers. I took a step and the Sheriff started yelling at me and reached for his gun. They ordered me against my trunk, and to put my chin on the trunk with my hands behind my back. I did. They asked if they could search my purse and car, I said why? They said they do not need to explain anything to me. I said, no. My son is in my car and at this point I could hear him crying. I asked if I could go talk to my son and they said NO.
on to the more absurd…. So I just did this thing about some of the absurdity that surrounds sex offender registry laws in the U.S and decided to figure out some twisted shit … can’t say I got to far in figuring out what the hell politicians are thinking and Why the hell the public buys this BS. So there are plenty of accounts of consensual teenage sex, drunken behaviors(indecent exposure, mooning, ass grabbing), spanking your kids, and many other non-serious crimes that are lumped in with the violent rapists and serial molesters under the sex registration legislation that have yet to prevent a single sex crime, but have caused 1000’s of vigilante crimes against families.. There is a couple in a southern state that may now lose their child because the father is a “sex offender”. Seems that a 16 YO girl had a relationship with her 19 or 20 YO boyfriend. The mom got upset over something, not the age difference, something else and called police. He was arrested, went to prison and added to the registry. When he got out of prison, the girl (girlfriend/victim of said crime) is 18 and they get married and have a child. She is the victim and he is the perpetrator… ironic, isn’t it, too bad these two high school sweethearts do not live happily ever after. They moved into a new house and were forced to move out due to harassment by neighbors who never even knew any details other than he is a “sex predator according to the internet”. The police got involved and a question was raised that convicted sex offenders are not allowed to be near children, even his own son. I mean… you never know, his tastes may in fact change from girls 3 years younger than him to baby boys in a flip of a switch in his head…. right? Yep, thats popular belief based on the misconception that the US justice system is in fact just and if you are in the registry you must have raped a small child a few times over. Only Sickos are registered, teens and non-serious stuff are not… right? ahh, NO! See, everyone from stupid kids, teen sweethearts, drunk ass grabbers, mooners, breast flashing girls, and in some states… fathers who spank the child are in the registry and you automatically become a homosexual pedophile, regardless of the original crime. Yep, the cute chick who flashed her boobs while drunk at a party becomes a “homo pedophile violent predator” if arrested for indecent exposure…. For LIFE! Anyway, having heard many stories of children removed from sex offender parents who never did anything wrong towards their child, i wanted to figure out were the State felt these children would be safe from the sex crazed parent. I found a lady in the same state who fosters children for the state when the parent is a sex offender and loses his/her custodial rights because people in the registry lose the right to have children, regardless of original crime, depending on the state. Here is her story in a nutshell…. She is an angel, Mother Teresa, reincarnated. She accepts money from the state to care for and house as many as 7 children of sex offenders at any given time. It is her cause and she has bought a house from the money she has made as well. She has done this for some time and her husband loves it. They are so caring. She has been married for 20 years to her husband and their own children are all grown, btw… she is 35 and her husband 46, oldest kid is 20. Say what? wait… doesn’t that mean she was 12 and he was 23 when they started dating? Isn’t that child molestation? So the couple whose kids got taken away for a 3 year difference in age gets placed with a couple with an 11 year difference, and grown children that prove that she was maybe 14 during conception and he was 26? But it’s all good because he is NOT a registered sex offender and therefore its fine. Her mom never called the cops on the relationship, even though she probably should have for a grown man dating her 12 YO daughter. Can I get a thumbs up for foster care in the US and legislative hypocrisies! Yep, the children are now safe from child molesters! a small note, I looked at prisoner visitation policy in CA… it goes as so. Adults must have ID to visit inmates. Wives of inmates with children, where the wife is not yet 18 can use a school ID. huh? Not 18 yet with a child? does that not make a PROVEN sex crime? Nah… no one got arrested so it’s a wholesome relationship.
ohh, this will be a long one because this issue aggravates me like none other.. For starters… just about every senior in high school who has dated a freshman or junior, the kid in college who is still dating his high school sweetheart, any dumb college kid who flashed or mooned anyone. the 12 year old kid who as a joke pulled down their younger siblings pants and laughed. the wrongfully accused and any man going through a bitter divorce with a vengeful wife. Anyway… 99.5% of the population So know who is a registered sex offender? Anyone who was unlucky enough to have been caught and someone lying about the age is no excuse…..everyone should be able to tell the difference between 17 and 18! period. think it could not possible be true? read on.
A 17 YO kid went to summer camp, sent there by his parents, he meets a girl at camp who tells him she is 16, they have a summer romance. Her parents find out, tell the kid she is only 13(he did not know, they are in the same teen summer camp together) he is now a registered sex offender for life. He is not allowed to return back to his school nor finish high school, he can never go to college or get a real job. Most likely he will spend 15 years in prison on registry violations before he is 40 and will be forced to move countless times as states add more and more places he no longer can live near.
A 20 year old college kid at spring break moons a group of girls with his buddies, gets arrested for indecent exposure. one of the girls has her 16 YO sister with her in the crowd. He is a sex offender for life. 20 years later, now 40, married with kids and having committed no crime the police come to his home, arrest him for a week lapse in registration, seems the Read the rest of this entry »
Lawyer: O.C. Inmate Died From Blows To His Head SANTA ANA, Calif. An inmate who died April 1 after a jailhouse struggle with Orange County sheriff’s deputies was killed by traumatic blows to his head, an attorney for the man’s father said in remarks reported Wednesday.
Can you say a few more problems in the justice system? well yes… Looks that that fool proof bite mark evidence, maybe absolute crap indeed and foolish to use since it may mean nothing other than the biter had some teeth, in this case, the bites were shown to not even be made by a human but by some fish. Â When will juries figure out that “PAID” experts that claim bite marks are like finger prints without DNA to back it up really have no clue and are just on there for a paycheck! in a nutshell… The dentist considered himself an authority on forensic odontology and had taken the stand at numerous trials as a paid expert for the prosecution. On the strength of West’s testimony and little else, a jury in 1995 convicted Kennedy Brewer of raping and murdering the 3-year-old girl and sentenced him to death. So the paid “so called” expert could not tell that the bites were not even human when paid by prosecutors to convict an innocent man. How do these assholes sleep at night? MACON, Mississippi (AP) — At a small-town courthouse in one of rural Mississippi’s poorest counties, Dr. Michael West swore under oath that a dead girl had bite marks all over her body and that they were made by the two front teeth of the man charged with murdering her.
Annie Brewer, right, hugs son Kennedy Brewer moments after a circuit court judge exonerated him. Such testimony had become commonplace for West. The dentist considered himself an authority on forensic odontology and had taken the stand at numerous trials as a paid expert for the prosecution. On the strength of West’s testimony and little else, a jury in 1995 convicted Kennedy Brewer of raping and murdering the 3-year-old girl and sentenced him to death. Three years earlier, West gave similar testimony in a nearly identical rape-and-murder case involving another 3-year-old girl from the same town. West testified there were bite marks on the victim’s wrist and they were made by Levon Brooks. Brooks, too, was found guilty and was sentenced to life in prison.
I watch Dateline and many other shows and documentaries that many times have episodes about people trying to free the innocent in prisons. Many times I just gotta say WTF? Is the job of the justice system to learn the truth or is it merely to convict someone to satisfy the masses and propel the careers and reputations of attorneys and judges… Unfortunately, many times its the later. Todays episode was about Clarence Elkins. In 1998 Elkin’s mother-in-law was killed and niece raped. The girl was at grandma’s house. The 6 year old niece saw the rapist and killer. After being raped and beaten the little girl ran to the next door neighbors home, a woman answered, the little girl stood bloody and beaten at the door and asked for help, the neighbor told the child to wait on the door step and went back in for 1/2 hour, after 1/2 hour she drove the little girl home. Now if a beaten, raped child runs to your door would you not just call 911? Who makes her wait for a 1/2 hour then drives her home? The litttle girl told police that the killer looked like Uncle Clarence so police arrested Uncle Clarence for rape and murder even though he had an alibi (his wife). Clarence Elkins was convicted on the testimony of a very traumatized 6 year old. Some DNA was tested but proved inconclusive with the tests at the time. The wife of Clarence Elkins set out to prove his innocence. Melinda Elkins lost her job, her home and her family since they KNEW Clarence did it. Melinda began her own investigation and looked for suspects trying to collect DNA. She later found out that to retest the DNA was extremely expensive 20k-40k per test and the state told her she was on her own. Melinda did some research on the neighbors and found out that the house the girl ran to after the rape/murder was that of a man who just got out of prison and was in prison for child rape and child molestation. Basically, Grandma lived next door to a child sex offender and the police and prosecution did not even know it or care to investigate the neighbors. They also did not think it strange that the neighbor left a raped, beaten 6 year old outside covered in blood, for 1/2 hour never calling police and finally just put the bloody girl in a car and drove her away.
This is a documentary from some years back about Saddam and the misuse of power and corruption behind his government. Its a bit long, about 50 minutes. Saddam Hussein and the Saddam Family album
I have always believed there is a huge amount of injustice and corruption in our court system. Too much attention and weight is given to media coverage with people being tried by the papers before the jury is even chosen, the so called “expert” witnesses that are paid well for the service. Those two things together steal life from the innocent and keep killers on the loose. Experts in any field, should not be compensated for their testimony. Media should be more responsible for the imagery they portray of the accused. But we know things do not work that way. “Monster on trial” sells more papers than a “man on trial” and experts get paid well to make the weakest of evidence look scientific and indisputable… It’s all a great show. Last night, watching the Discovery channel they showed the case of the “snaggletooth” killer. The reason he is called that is because he has crooked teeth. His teeth and the grotesque and ugly images associated with his nickname ultimately got him convicted and sentenced to death. The snaggletooth killer, Mr. Ray Krone had a front tooth that was pushed out as did a bite mark on the victim. Do you hear the toot toot of the train coming yet? Early one morning over a decade ago, a bartender was closing up the bar for the night . Everyone left and she was alone. The following morning, the bar’s owner found the dead body of Kim Ancona, on the men’s bathroom floor. There were no witnesses and very little evidence to go on. The only evidence was a bite mark on the victim, a size 10.5 converse shoe print on the floor and 2 black hairs. In looking for suspects, the police found out that Kim may have been attracted to a patron at the bar by the name of Ray Krone. His name was found in her phone book and the investigation quickly centered on him. Ray Krone had no criminal record, no relationship with Kim other than he knew her from the bar, was not pursuing her romantically nor had any motive to kill her. Ray also had an alibi, his roommate confirmed that Ray was home that night. After confirming that Ray, just like the killer had a pushed out front tooth, the police arrested him for the murder of Kim. The papers dubbed him the “snaggletooth” killer, that bought Ray a one way Amtrak ticket through the American justice system. Poor Ray was pigeon holed into a stereotype for having crooked teeth. I wonder had he not been called the “snaggletooth” killer, would he ever been convicted. That animalistic name and imagery of a mangled, ugly person already may have convicted Ray before trial ever began. Ray Krone is just a man, but “snaggletooth killer” is a demon. In fact, so many things went wrong here that it’s hard to even know where to start. So lets start with the facts. The shoe print found at the scene was the wrong size, Ray wore 9.5 shoes not 10.5 and Ray had long light hair not short black hair like the 2 hairs found. The 2 hairs found came from a man of non-white descent. With all this evidence that did not match, an alibi, and no motive, how was he convicted? For one, what jury would ever want to set free the monster known as the “snaggletooth killer” and the prosecution got the states expert in dentistry, Dr. Raymond Rawson to testify. Dr. Rawson convinced the Jury that bite marks are like fingerprints and can identify the killer just like a good print can. Dr. Rawson put on a great show with slides, overlays, bells and whistles to show how Ray Crone was unquestionably the person that bit Kim. The jury believed the Doctor and dismissed the other evidence completely. Ray Krone was sentenced to die for being the “snaggletooth” killer, convicted by a name and a bite mark. On appeal, The defence brought in 3 dental experts, all of whom disagreed with Dr. Rawson’s opinion. In fact all three agreed that the killer seemed to have a gap between his front teeth and Ray Krone did not. But, the prosecution and the dental expert Dr. Rawson again convinced the jury that Ray did in fact bite Kim. Ray, again was found guilty. One of the dentists that disagreed with Dr. Rawson claims he later talked to Rawson about the case, urging him to take another look at the bite and check out the missing gap. The dentist claims that Rawson actually admitted to him that he may be wrong, but was in to deep to go back on it now. In too deep? A man’s life is at stake here. How is a pro expert’s career more important than a life? well, for Dr. Rawson it was. Dr. Rawson did not want to admit he made a mistake nor turn down the jobs that came with being a well known expert and a man that could get a conviction. Here is were Ray Krone got lucky. In the decade Krone spent in Prison, laws changed and DNA techniques were improved. His family got the state to allow them to re-examine the old evidence, the blood and saliva found at the scene. The saliva was inconclusive, but in the re-examination a small drop of blood was found on Kim’s pants. The drop that may have been disregarded as being hers since there was so much of Kim’s blood at the murder. The DNA excluded Ray. In another lucky break, the DNA was run through the state’s computer and came up with a match. A sex offender that was currently in prison that lived directly behind the bar at that time. The man wore size 9.5 shoes and had short black hair. So it’s looking up for Ray now.
After 10 years Mr. Krone was set free. Ray Krone lost a decade of his life to bad publicity and a corrupt expert witness who was willing to lie to promote his career on a famous case. Of course, what made the case famous was the media invention of a monster called “snaggletooth”. Stories such as this are found too frequently. Last week I saw anther one about an expert that literally planted evidence at the scene to make her look like more of an expert. Ray Krone got very lucky, how many others were not? The “real” snaggletooth killer also got lucky here. He was never investigated and got many extra years to do what he liked best, raping and brutalizing woman. The prosecution in their fervor to get a conviction at any cost helped a sex offender stay free, or at least free ’till some “good” investigation work got him busted for his crimes. So whats the point here? Expert Witness should not be an occupation. The state should not be using professional witnesses that they know will try to get a conviction for them regardless of evidence. Just like jurors, experts should be called into court to do a civic duty so they do not care about reputation, conviction rate and how much they can charge next time if they get the conviction. The jury needs honest expert opinions, not “paid for” ones. Can you imagine if the jury system worked like the expert system? hmm.
I was watching a Court TV show last night called Wrong Man. It is a documentary type show that follows retired NY detective Jerry Palace around as he investigates cases of people who may have been wrongfully accused and convicted. Last nights show was called “a mother’s cry” and recalls a case from the early 90’s where a mother reported her child abducted from a market and believed a police officer was the man who abducted and later killed the girl. The mother was convicted of murder on very little evidence all of which was circumstantial and easily explained. One of the pieces of evidence was her hair found on the girls body. The detectives went around questioning people and found witnesses who were never allowed to testify and whose testimony may have cleared the mother. One of those witnesses was the attorney for the ex cop that the mother says stalked her daughter prior to the abduction. I say ex-cop, because James Glover was fired from the police department later for staging a shooting. Yes, the man took off his vest, shot it twice, put it back on, and reported that he had been shot. When the department found out it was all a lie, he was fired. Anyway, his attorney, said on camera that she had knowledge that would have cleared the mother but was not allowed to testify and break attorney-client priveledge, even if the attorney-client clause sent an innocent woman to jail for life. Also, the attorney recalls that James Glover approached her and her small daughter at the time and implied a threat against the attorneys own child. At the end of the show, the detectives were now convinced that this young single mother was railroaded and probably should never have been arrested to begin with. The mother Teresa is in a catch 22. She is eligible for parole, but will never be paroled unless she confesses to the murder and she has already stated that she will never confess to the murder therefor never getting paroled. She’s damned if she does and damned if she doesn’t. It blows my mind that the parole board is pushing for a confession from a woman who has claimed she had nothing to do with the kidnapping and murder from the start. If she confesses just to get out, it will give them ammunition to deny parole, if she does not confess, she will not be paroled either… try that one. Anyway, the story is below the website for retired detective Jerry Palace is Here
COURT TVÂŽ SHEDS NEW LIGHT ON THIRTEEN-YEAR-OLD CASE IN “THE WRONG MAN? A MOTHER’S CRY” Former NYPD Detective Jerry Palace Returns as Lead Investigator of Network’s Ongoing “The Wrong Man” Series As It Delves Into the Mysterious Murder of Macon, Georgia Child, Taylor Fargason New York, NY - Did a Georgia woman kill her six-year-old daughter or is the wrong person serving a jail term for the crime? A one-hour Court TV investigation raises troubling new questions about the case in The Wrong Man?ÂŽ A Mother’s Cry, Court TV commissioned retired New York Police Detective Jerry Palace and his partner Reggie Britt to retrace the heartbreaking crime, pursuing leads, examining evidence and speaking with a number of the key players, including Teresa Fargason, who is currently serving a life sentence in a Georgia prison. Fargason vehemently maintains her innocence, and several others involved in the investigation concur. This fascinating one-hour documentary is part of Court TV’s continuing series of “Wrong Man” documentary investigations, which air as part of the network’s signature series, “The SystemÂŽ.” Teresa Fargason’s life changed forever on a Sunday evening in June, 1991, when her daughter Taylor disappeared from a Kroger grocery store around 9:00 p.m. Police would later discover the girl’s body by the side of a road about six miles from the store. After Fargason failed a lie detector test, police became suspicious of her story. One year after the murder, Fargason was arrested and, after refusing to accept a plea bargain, she was convicted of her daughter’s murder and sentenced to life. Fargason has been incarcerated since 1993 and has already been denied parole once, in late 2000. In the documentary, which is the only in-depth, comprehensive look at this tragic case done to date, Palace and Britt journey to the prison and speak with Fargason. She points out several key pieces of evidence that did not make it into her trial - evidence she believes could have lead to a very different outcome. Fargason reveals that a local police officer by the name of James Glover had apparently been following her and her daughter, and on one occasion he had even given Taylor a teddy bear, without her mother’s knowledge, when the two were stopped at a car wash. Step by step, Palace and Britt take viewers through the investigation, speaking with the District Attorney who prosecuted the case, Fargason’s lawyer, a forensic expert, two witnesses who said they had seen a little girl in the store that evening but were not called to testify for Fargason’s defense. They also speak with a lawyer, Lynne Finney, who had represented former police officer James Glover and who appears to have evidence that could aid Fargason’s case. And, in an extremely explosive on camera exchange, Palace and Britt come face-to-face with Glover, confronting him about his behavior and the murder of Taylor Fargason. Palace, who was uncertain about Fargason’s innocence until he had conducted his own hands-on investigation for the show now says, “In our opinion, the investigation was nothing more than an orchestrated witch-hunt intent on gathering enough circumstantial evidence to prosecute and convict Teresa at any cost. We think Teresa got a raw deal and should have never been convicted, let alone arrested in the first place.” “What happened to me is irrelevant,” says Fargason, “but the person that did this needs to be punished. That’s what I want to see done. That’s what gets me through every day.” The Wrong Man?ÂŽ A Mother’s Cry is the fifth in a series of special presentations that explore cases in which doubt has been cast on the investigations, the suspects and the facts surrounding the criminal cases. The producers conduct fresh interviews with law enforcement officials and family members and, when possible, track down the person who may have been responsible for the crime. The documentary is produced by Michael Schlossman for Court TV. Anthony Horn, Vice President, Court TV Productions, serves as the Executive Producer for Court TV. Ed Hersh is Senior VP, Documentaries and Specials for Court TV. The Wrong Man?ÂŽ series was created by Award-winning documentarian Joe Berlinger. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||